AI coding · Head to head
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot: which is better?
Short answer
Cursor costs less in the first year ($96 vs $600). Pick Cursor for AI-first code editor; pick GitHub Copilot for IDE autocomplete and agents inside GitHub.
| Fact | Cursor | GitHub Copilot | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | AI-first code editor | IDE autocomplete and agents inside GitHub | — |
| Free plan | Yes, limited agent and chat requests | Yes, limited chat and agent usage | Tie |
| Entry plan | Plus: $8 / mo | Pro: $10 / seat / mo | — |
| Mid plan | Premium: $30 / mo | Pro+: $39 / seat / mo | — |
| Top plan | Ultra: $200 / mo | Max: $100 / seat / mo | — |
| 1st year | $96 | $600 | Cursor |
| Platforms | macOS, Windows, Linux | Web, Chrome extension, API, macOS, Windows, Linux | GitHub Copilot |
Edge = the better published number or limit; we do not test the tools hands-on.
Which has the better free plan, Cursor or GitHub Copilot?
Neither stands out: Cursor: Yes, limited agent and chat requests; GitHub Copilot: Yes, limited chat and agent usage.
Should you pick Cursor or GitHub Copilot?
Pick Cursor if
- you want AI-first code editor
- the free plan is enough (limited agent and chat requests)
Pick GitHub Copilot if
- you want IDE autocomplete and agents inside GitHub
- the free plan is enough (limited chat and agent usage)
Sources
| Vendor page | URL | Checked |
|---|---|---|
| Cursor pricing | cursor.com/pricing | 27 Oct 2026 |
| GitHub Copilot pricing | github.com/features/copilot/plans | 27 Oct 2026 |
Prices in USD as published by each vendor, billed yearly where offered. How we compare