AI coding · Head to head
Cursor vs Amazon Q Developer: which is better?
Short answer
Cursor costs less in the first year ($96 vs $1,140). Pick Cursor for AI-first code editor; pick Amazon Q Developer for AWS-centric development teams.
| Fact | Cursor | Amazon Q Developer | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | AI-first code editor | AWS-centric development teams | — |
| Free plan | Yes, limited agent and chat requests | Yes, free tier with advanced capabilities | Tie |
| Entry plan | Plus: $8 / mo | Pro: $19 / seat / mo | — |
| Mid plan | Premium: $30 / mo | Pro: $19 / seat / mo | — |
| Top plan | Ultra: $200 / mo | Pro: $19 / seat / mo | — |
| 1st year | $96 | $1,140 | Cursor |
| Platforms | macOS, Windows, Linux | Web, API | Cursor |
Edge = the better published number or limit; we do not test the tools hands-on.
Which has the better free plan, Cursor or Amazon Q Developer?
Neither stands out: Cursor: Yes, limited agent and chat requests; Amazon Q Developer: Yes, free tier with advanced capabilities.
Should you pick Cursor or Amazon Q Developer?
Pick Cursor if
- you want AI-first code editor
- the free plan is enough (limited agent and chat requests)
Pick Amazon Q Developer if
- you want AWS-centric development teams
- the free plan is enough (free tier with advanced capabilities)
Sources
| Vendor page | URL | Checked |
|---|---|---|
| Cursor pricing | cursor.com/pricing | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Amazon Q Developer pricing | aws.amazon.com/q/developer/pricing/ | 27 Oct 2026 |
Prices in USD as published by each vendor, billed yearly where offered. How we compare